Photo by Tomi Johnson |
Once upon a time, I was a reporter for a public television station in Kentucky. One of my most memorable assignments was uncovering the historical significance of an incident which occurred in Corbin, Ky. It was documented that in 1919, the town’s black residents were herded onto railroad cars and taken away from the place with the “sundown” reputation – blacks were told to be gone before sunset.
When I got to
Corbin, I was labeled a troublemaker and threatened by the Chamber of Commerce
president who viewed my investigation into the past bad publicity. Little did I
realize that an industrial park was being built there, and the town’s leaders
were afraid that potential corporate landlords would view past racial tensions too
intense and risky for business development. When I returned to the television station with
the story in the can, the operators who had received a call from the CC president forbade me to broadcast the information.
Today, metadata
says and proves all, and it is released feverishly on the Internet by institutional
and self-proclaimed journalists. Journalistic
metadata is powerful, but handling it is tricky. An investigative journalist
may uncover secrets, but the information may be suppressed by the organization
s(he) works for since all such entities have their own political and marketing
agendas. The true starving journalist may blog uncompensated but still run the
risk of becoming a government or institutional target.
Case in point: The
United Kingdom policy document, Joint Doctrine Publication 3-45.1: Media
Operations, was promulgated by the Chiefs of Staff in 2007 and describes instructions
on handling military media operations. The policy states
that while the entire UK population is usually considered the "principal
target", the "most influential target" is “people who hold
disproportionate influence on the direction of government and public thinking
and policy development."
Included in this
target group are newspaper columnists and journalists who often do more than
report news but voice opinions on current affairs. I think bloggers have also
been added to this group, for I have been told by a human resources
professional that blogging or any type of social media reporting may limit employment
opportunities. One question asked on a recent online job application was
whether I ever used social media as a reporting vehicle.
This makes it
very disheartening when your craft deals with disseminating information. Mainstream
media disarms you, but you feel compelled to tell what you know. Metadata(pen)
being mightier than the sword cuts both ways. This is a hard revelation for inspiring journalists, but advice which must be heeded.
Mahmooda said: The thing that I love most about America is freedom of speech. It is democracy. Beautiful and pure. Truth comes out one way or another that is the nature of it. I feel
ReplyDeletegrateful for those who do investigative reporting. They are brave people, deserve
our respect. We can not have a culture of fear, I have seen it in Pakistan where I
grew up, its ugly and suffocating.